Abstract

The current issue on inter-firm technology transfer (TT) is centered on the efficiency and effectiveness of the transfer process by the multinationals (MNCs) where the success is strongly associated with degree of technology transferred to local partners. Based on the underlying knowledge-based view (KBV) and organizational learning (OL) perspectives, the main objective of this paper is to empirically examine the effects of four critical technology transfer characteristics: knowledge, technology recipient, technology supplier, and relationship characteristics on two distinct dimensions of degree of technology transfer: degree of tacit and explicit knowledge. Using the quantitative analytical approach, the theoretical model and hypotheses in this study were tested based on empirical data gathered from 128 joint venture companies registered with the Registrar of Companies of Malaysia (ROC). Data obtained from the survey questionnaires were analyzed using the correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analyses. The results revealed that relationship characteristics have the strongest significant effects on both degrees of tacit and explicit knowledge followed by technology supplier and recipient characteristics. Contrary to the study’s prediction, but still consistent with the recent development in literature, knowledge characteristics have only significantly affected degree of explicit knowledge not degree of tacit knowledge. The study has bridged the literature gaps by providing empirical evidence on the effects of four critical technology transfer characteristics: knowledge, technology recipient, technology supplier, and relationship characteristics on two distinct dimensions of degree of inter-firm technology transfer: degree of tacit and explicit knowledge in IJVs in a single model.

Highlights

  • The multinational corporations (MNCs) have been regarded as the most efficient vehicle for transferring technology and knowledge across borders through strategic alliances and international joint ventures (IJVs) (Tihanyi and Roath, 2002; Kagut and Zander, 1993)

  • Relationship characteristics (RCHAR) had the highest correlation with both degrees of tacit knowledge (TCTDEG) and explicit knowledge (EXPDEG) (p < 0.01) followed by technology recipient characteristics (TRCHAR) (p < 0.01) and technology supplier characteristics (TSCHAR) (p < 0.01) suggesting that high degrees of RCHAR, Technology Recipient Characteristics (TRCHAR) and Technology Supplier Characteristics (TSCHAR) are associated with high degrees of tacit (TCTDEG) and explicit knowledge (EXPDEG)

  • On the high correlations between RCHAR and both TCTDEG and EXPDEG, the results are in line with the current proposition by the literature which suggested that the role of Knowledge Characteristics (KCHAR) as the most important knowledge transfer determinant has been superseded by TRCHAR and TSCHAR and by RCHAR (Szulanski and Cappetta, 2003; Hansen and Lovas, 2004)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The multinational corporations (MNCs) have been regarded as the most efficient vehicle for transferring technology and knowledge across borders through strategic alliances and IJVs (Tihanyi and Roath, 2002; Kagut and Zander, 1993). Organizations in the developing countries are attempting to collaborate, learn and internalize their foreign partner’s technological knowledge by forming strategic alliances and international joint ventures (IJVs) with foreign multinational corporations (MNCs) as an efficient mean to increase their competitiveness, technological capabilities, and potential for local innovation. The inter-firm technology transfers (TT) in international joint ventures (IJVs) have often involved tradeoffs between the www.ccsenet.org/ass technology suppliers’ willingness to transfer their considerable amount of technologies; which include tacit and explicit knowledge, degree of protection of the proprietary technology (knowledge and competencies) as the source of the supplier’s competitive advantage (Inkpen, 2000), degree of transparency (Hamel, 1991), and motivation to transfer (Szulanski, 1996). Organizational learning (OL) perspective studies have suggested that technology and knowledge tend to be protected by the supplier when the recipients are opportunistic in the collaborative relationship (Inkpen, 1998a; Inkpen and Dinur, 1998; Child and Faulkner, 1998)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call