Abstract

Stock prices reflect firms-related information differently depending on the environmental and institutional context. However, previous empirical studies test mainly accounting data. Since intangible assets became a crucial element for business success and brands are considered critical for value creation, correlated disclosure is proven to be value relevant for investors. The majority of accounting standards do not allow to recognize internally generated intangible assets in the balance sheet and therefore more and more practitioners, both investors and analysts, use brand values provided by third independent parties, such as consulting firms. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether and how brand-related information differs across countries testing the value relevance of brand values published in Brand Finance’s Reports. This study aims to open a new stream of literature regarding the value relevance of non-accounting information across countries.

Highlights

  • Intangible assets represent one of determinants of firm value

  • Prior literature provides many evidences that the value relevance of accounting data differs across countries and it is affected by the institutional context and environmental characteristics

  • No previous study examines the cross-country value relevance of brand values provided by third-independent parties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intangible assets represent one of determinants of firm value. In particular, companies pay more attention to the promotion of their brands since they consider them as a crucial asset for value creation (Madden, Fehle &Fournier, 2006) and as drivers of abnormal earnings creation (Beretta Zanoni & Vernizzi, 2014). Intangible assets represent one of determinants of firm value. Companies pay more attention to the promotion of their brands since they consider them as a crucial asset for value creation The results reveal that non-accounting values provided by consulting firms (e.g. Interbrand, Brand Finance and BrandZ) are relevant to equity valuation of companies (Bagna, Dicuonzo, Perrone & Dell’Atti, 2017). This is due to two main reasons: (1) the significant role brands take on in firm valuation (Barth & Clinch, 1998) and (2)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.