Abstract

Kinematic soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects cause foundation-level motions to deviate from free-field motions. Simplified procedures to account for kinematic SSI effects are available in design guidelines for regular buildings and have been calibrated for regular buildings with limited foundation size and depth of embedment. As a result, their application to structures with much larger foundation footprints and deeper embedment depths is questionable. Kinematic interaction effects can be used to reduce foundation-level ground motions relative to those specified in the free-field, and this can be cost-effective especially for structures with larger footprints and embedment depths. The objective of this study is to quantify the extent of deviations between the use of available simplified procedures and empirical data for a select group of structures with larger footprints and embedment depths. In this study, a dataset of earthquake motions recorded at the instrumented structures in Japan is used to evaluate kinematic SSI effects, which are quantified in terms of the transfer function and the ratio of response spectra between foundation motions and corresponding free-field motions. Transfer functions represent the ratio between the free-field and the foundation level of a structure motion in the frequency domain and can be obtained by dividing Power Spectral Density functions of foundation motion and corresponding free-field motion. Finally, these empirical functions are compared to the available simplified formulations such as the semi-empirical transfer function and the ASCE/SEI 41–17 recommended ratio of response spectra, and the results are presented in terms of residuals. The overall trends of residuals indicate that the current simplified procedures tend to overestimate the foundation motions in structures with large footprints and embedment depths, and the extent of overestimation is higher for the ratio of response spectra compared to transfer functions. Thus, in future studies, these simplified procedures should be revised for applications in structures with large footprints and embedment depths.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.