Abstract
Recent criticism of empirical clinical practice uses gender differences and the conflict between quantitative and qualitative research methodologies to describe the rift between practitioners and researchers. The authors offer an alternative view of empirical clinical practice, emphasizing its congruence with the ethics of good practice and with feminist perspectives. The article also specifically addresses the criticism of the use of contracts, objective measures, and of the role of the worker-client relationship in empirical models of practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
