Abstract

In this work, two approaches to predict the producer gas composition obtained by direct (air) biomass gasification in bubbling fluidized beds were developed and compared, namely empirical modelling based on reported experimental results in the literature and non-stoichiometric chemical equilibrium modelling. For this purpose, an extensive database containing a set of 19 published experimental results from the literature was compiled and a non-stoichiometric chemical equilibrium model developed.The prediction capability of the empirical and chemical equilibrium model was evaluated by comparison with experimental data obtained in an 80 kWth bubbling fluidized bed direct (air) biomass gasifier. The empirical model shows moderate accuracy in the determination of the producer gas composition (CO, H2 and CH4), whereas the chemical equilibrium clearly overestimates the concentration of H2 and CO, and underestimates the concentration of CH4, leading to subpar accuracy in the determination of typical gasification efficiency parameters. Thus, the empirical model is suited for preliminary estimates of gasification products, while black-box chemical equilibrium modelling, without experimental knowledge integration, is considered as unreliable for these gasification conditions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.