Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
The Roman high-avoidance (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) strains of rats were tested and compared with Maudsley reactive (MR) and non-reactive (MNR) strains to assess the relative contributions of emotionality and conditionability to differences between the two Roman strains. The RHA learned significantly faster in active avoidance, but slightly slower in passive avoidance, significantly faster in acquisition of an active approach task, but slightly slower in extinction of active approach tasks despite extensive adaptation and gentling. The RHA showed more ‘rearing’, more activity in the open field and more variety-seeking. Crossing with MNR showed the RHA less reactive in the open field. Results show RLA equivocal in conditionability, more emotional, and perhaps less active.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
