Emotional correlates of selection for avoidance learning in rats

Abstract

The Roman high-avoidance (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) strains of rats were tested and compared with Maudsley reactive (MR) and non-reactive (MNR) strains to assess the relative contributions of emotionality and conditionability to differences between the two Roman strains. The RHA learned significantly faster in active avoidance, but slightly slower in passive avoidance, significantly faster in acquisition of an active approach task, but slightly slower in extinction of active approach tasks despite extensive adaptation and gentling. The RHA showed more ‘rearing’, more activity in the open field and more variety-seeking. Crossing with MNR showed the RHA less reactive in the open field. Results show RLA equivocal in conditionability, more emotional, and perhaps less active.