Abstract

Interdisciplinary research and education programmes in water science are intended to produce groundbreaking research, often with an emphasis on societal relevance, and prepare future water resource experts to work across disciplines. This paper explores the emerging outcomes from an ongoing doctoral programme currently in its seventh year. Within the programme, there is both cross-disciplinary and mono-disciplinary research. Three questions are explored: (i) whether cross-disciplinary research leads to more innovative scientific findings than mono-disciplinary research, (ii) whether cross-disciplinary researchers develop professional skills that benefit their future careers, and (iii) whether cross-disciplinary research produces findings of greater societal relevance than mono-disciplinary research. Various indicators are used to measure research and education outcomes. Analysis of journal impact factors and citation rates of Institute of Scientific Information indexed publications suggests that cross-disciplinary research findings are more innovative. Comparison between graduate research profile and their career destinations suggests that researchers who learn to work across the disciplines continue to work this way in their post-doctoral positions. Analysis of media interest in research findings or their impact on policy suggests that both types of research are of societal value, but researchers often expand their understanding of a societal interest topic by bringing in new research fields.

Highlights

  • Some of the most exciting research progress is made at the intersection between the traditional research disciplines (National Academy of Sciences, 2004)

  • This evaluation has used the Vienna Doctoral Programme as a case study to explore some of the outcomes that are emerging from an established interdisciplinary doctoral programme

  • Is the amount of cross-disciplinary research increasing but it seems to be of slightly higher innovative quality than that of the mono-disciplinary research, based on the number of citations and impact factors of the journals in which the papers are published

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Some of the most exciting research progress is made at the intersection between the traditional research disciplines (National Academy of Sciences, 2004). Water resource systems are complex and no single discipline or research field has all the answers. An extensive collection of fields are involved in understanding, for example, the fate and transport of pollutants in a river catchment. They include hydrology, meteorology, geology, geomorphology, soil science, and biological and plant sciences, as well as economics, law and sociology. Research that integrates different bodies of knowledge from different disciplines or fields is essential for understanding integrated systems such as water resources ( Jeffrey, 2003)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call