Embedded wa-phrases, predication, and judgment theory

Abstract

Topic marking with the particle wa is a prevalent phenomenon in Japanese, and it is generally considered a root phenomenon, as its appearance is much more restricted under embedding. While it has been pointed out that there are some types of embedded clauses that allow wa-phrases, relative clauses present the most restricted linguistic environment for the particle. This exceptional restrictiveness cannot be attributed to a general constraint on wa in embedded contexts. Adopting Kuroda’s (Japanese syntax and semantics, 1992) theory of wa-marking, I argue that the restriction on wa in relative clauses is a result of the clash between two distinct notions of ‘predication’; the general understanding of the term relevant to the predicate abstraction process in a relative clause and Kuroda’s notion of predication, which is structurally manifested in a sentence with wa. Specifically, the lack of wa-marking in relative clauses is due to the illicit abstraction process that crosses over wa-phrases. It will be shown that the analysis has many consequences beyond relative clauses. In particular, it explains the wide scope tendency of topic phrases and the distribution of wa in as diverse sentence types as wh-interrogatives, scrambled sentences, cleft sentences, and clausal comparatives.