Abstract

ABSTRACTEntomopathogenic fungi (EF) provide a potent biocontrol tool; also, their endophytic behavior has broadened their contribution to integrated pest management (IPM) and crop production. In this work, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium brunneum were applied to bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings to elucidate how fungal colonization influences plant growth and the relative expression of 24 genes involved in hormonal syntheses and plant immune mechanisms. A preliminary assay was used to determine the time needed for fungal colonization and assess its effect on wheat growth. Then, plant material collected at various times after inoculation (viz., 2, 8, 20, and 36 h and 9 and 15 days) was used to investigate gene expression by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). During the colonization time, B. bassiana and M. brunneum caused strong downregulation of most genes associated with plant immunity and the synthesis of hormones like auxin, cytokinin, and gibberellin. This effect was concomitant with a slowdown of endophytic-colonization-related plant growth until 19 days postinoculation (dpi). However, the wheat started to recover at 15 dpi, simultaneously with upregulation of auxin- and gibberellin-related genes. The results suggest that the EF trigger induced systemic resistance rather than acquired systemic resistance during early plant-microbe cross talk in wheat. Also, they confirm that the hormone and immune responses of wheat triggered by EF inoculation influenced plant growth, which can be useful with a view to optimizing management of these microorganisms for sustainable agriculture.IMPORTANCE Microbial control of insect and mite pests is a key tool to develop integrated pest management (IPM) and sustainable agriculture. Entomopathogenic fungi (EF) may have associations with the plants, playing additional ecological roles in the rhizosphere, in the phylloplane, and as plant endophytes. Beauveria bassiana 04/01TIP and Metarhizium brunneum 01/58Su are two strains that showed very good results either in pest control or plant growth promotion and would be good candidates to develop mycoinsecticides as an alternative to pesticides. However, deep knowledge about their interaction with the plant would let farmers optimize their use and understand the plant response, enhancing and promoting their broader contribution to IPM and crop production.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.