Abstract
Objective To compare electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) with traditional suturing during vaginal hysterectomy. Methods In a randomized controlled trial involving 68 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease, 37 procedures were performed using EBVS and 31 using traditional suturing. The end points were procedure time, blood loss, number of ligatures used, postoperative pain score, and number of days in hospital. Results The procedure duration was shorter using EBVS (median duration, 32 vs. 40 min; P = .0003), with fewer ligatures (1 vs. 7; P < .0001) and less pain (median score, 4 vs. 6; P < .0001). There were no significant differences regarding blood loss (median, 100 vs. 160 mL; P = .36) and days in hospital (median, 2 vs. 2; P = .03). Conclusion The EBVS system provided advantages over traditional suturing with regard to procedure time, number of ligatures used, and postoperative pain score.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
