Abstract

Electrostatic interaction energy W between two point charges in a three-layer plane system was calculated on the basis of the Green’s function method in the classical model of constant dielectric permittivities for all media involved. A regular method for the calculation of W ( Z , Z ′ , R ) , where Z and Z ′ are the charge coordinates normal to the interfaces, and R the lateral (along the interfaces) distance between the charges, was proposed. The method consists in substituting the evaluation of integrals of rapidly oscillating functions over the semi-infinite interval by constructing an analytical series of inverse radical functions to a required accuracy. Simple finite-term analytical approximations of the dependence W ( Z , Z ′ , R ) were proposed. Two especially important particular cases of charge configurations were analyzed in more detail: (i) both charges are in the same medium and Z = Z ′ ; and (ii) the charges are located at different interfaces across the slab. It was demonstrated that the W dependence on the charge–charge distance S = R 2 + Z − Z ′ 2 differs from the classical Coulombic one W ∼ S − 1 . This phenomenon occurs due to the appearance of polarization charges at both interfaces, which ascribes a many-body character to the problem from the outset. The results obtained testify, in particular, that the electron–hole interaction in heterostructures leading to the exciton formation is different in the intra-slab and across-slab charge configurations, which is usually overlooked in specific calculations related to the subject concerned. Our consideration clearly demonstrates the origin, the character, and the consequences of the actual difference. The often used Rytova–Keldysh approximation was analyzed. The cause of its relative success was explained, and the applicability limits were determined.

Highlights

  • Electrostatic interactions in layered systems have been extensively studied in the literature, making allowance, if necessary, for the spatial and temporal dispersion of the dielectric functions ε(k, ω) in the constituent media [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]

  • In the papers cited above, it was demonstrated that the effects of spatial and temporal dispersion are important and sometimes crucial when describing various phenomena governed by the layered character of the system

  • Certain phenomena in the layered structures, e.g., exciton-related ones, can be understood even in the ε = const approximation. The latter brings about some interesting results that are not eliminated by the account of the spatial dispersion effects [11,13,15,22,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electrostatic interactions in layered systems have been extensively studied in the literature, making allowance, if necessary, for the spatial and temporal dispersion of the dielectric functions ε(k, ω) in the constituent media [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Certain phenomena in the layered structures, e.g., exciton-related ones, can be understood even in the ε = const (constant-dielectric-permittivity, CDP) approximation. The latter brings about some interesting results that are not eliminated by the account of the spatial dispersion effects (the screening non-locality) [11,13,15,22,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.