Abstract

BackgroundVisuospatial processing requires wide distribution or narrow focusing of attention to certain regions in space. This mechanism is described by the zoom lens model and predicts an inverse correlation between the efficiency of processing and the size of the attentional scope. Little is known, however, about the exact timing of the effects of attentional scaling on visual searching and whether or not additional processing phases are involved in this process.MethodElectroencephalographic recordings were made while participants performed a visual search task under different attentional scaling conditions. Two concentric circles of different sizes, presented to the participants at the center of a screen modulated the attentional scopes, and search arrays were distributed in the space areas indicated by these concentric circles. To ensure consistent eccentricity of the search arrays across different conditions, we limited our studies to the neural responses evoked by the search arrays distributed in the overlapping region of different attentional scopes.ResultsConsistent with the prediction of the zoom lens model, our behavioral data showed that reaction times for target discrimination of search arrays decreased and the associated error rates also significantly decreased, with narrowing the attentional scope. Results of the event-related potential analysis showed that the target-elicited amplitude of lateral occipital N1, rather than posterior P1, which reflects the earliest visuospatial attentional processing, was sensitive to changes in the scaling of visuospatial attention, indicating that the modulation of the effect of changes in the spatial scale of attention on visual processing occurred after the delay period of P1. The N1 generator exhibited higher activity as the attentional scope narrowed, reflecting more intensive processing resources within the attentional focus. In contrast to N1, the amplitude of N2pc increased with the expansion of the attentional focus, suggesting that observers might further redistribute attentional resources according to the increased task difficulty.ConclusionThese findings provide electrophysiological evidence that the neural activity of the N1 generator is the earliest marker of the zoom lens effect of visual spatial attention. Furthermore, evidence from N2pc shows that there is also a redistribution of attentional resources after the action of the zoom lens mechanism, which allows for better perform of the search task in the context of low attentional resolution. On the basis of the timing of P1, N1, and N2pc, our findings provide compelling evidence that visuospatial attention processing in the zoom lens paradigm involves multi-stage dynamic processing.

Highlights

  • One of the most notable characteristics of the human attentional system is the limited amount of resources available to it

  • These results were in line with the predictions of the zoom lens model, indicating that as the scope of attention narrowed, the observers were able to identify the feature of the target faster and more accurately

  • Our event-related potentials (ERPs) results showed that changes in the attentional scope modulated the target-elicited P1, N1, and N2pc differently, indicating that visual attention processing in the zoom lens paradigm is characterized by multi-stage dynamic processing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most notable characteristics of the human attentional system is the limited amount of resources available to it. When performing visual search tasks, the amount of visual information pertinent to a given search situation often exceeds the maximal amount of information that can be processed by the attentional system at any given time In this case, top-down attention control plays a key role in rationalizing the use of such limited resources for attention processing. Top-down attention control plays a key role in rationalizing the use of such limited resources for attention processing Through this mechanism, an observer can choose to process a small number of spatial stimuli while ignoring information associated with other locations. Visuospatial processing requires wide distribution or narrow focusing of attention to certain regions in space This mechanism is described by the zoom lens model and predicts an inverse correlation between the efficiency of processing and the size of the attentional scope. On the basis of the timing of P1, N1, and N2pc, our findings provide compelling evidence that visuospatial attention processing in the zoom lens paradigm involves multi-stage dynamic processing

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call