Abstract
Individual identification of beef cattle is not new to the Canadian beef industry, as traceback systems played a pivotal role in the eradication of bovine tuberculosis in the 1940s and 1950s and brucellosis in the 1970s and 1980s. Recent concerns over animal health (e.g., bovine spongiform encephaolopathy), export markets, product consistency, meat quality (e.g., tenderness, marbling) and safety (e.g., Escherichia. coli 0157:H7, Salmonella spp.) make reestablishment of a traceback system a logical approach to assuring consumer confidence in Canadian beef. Originally, simple Kurl-lockTM ear tags with a unique number were used to trace individuals back to their herd of origin. Although useful for addressing disease concerns, this system did not lend itself to compiling additional information (e.g., growth performance, animal health, breeding programs, carcass quality) for use in management or marketing decisions. More sophisticated electronic identification systems can readily interface with computers and make information management an even more pivotal component of beef production. Several electronic identification systems (e.g., bar codes, radio frequency identification, read–write systems) are being assessed for their effectiveness for identifying individual cattle under production conditions. In research applications, this technology has the potential for individual animals to become the experimental unit under group housing conditions. By combining electronic identification technology with devices that measure physiological (e.g., temperature, pH, body weight, feed intake) parameters, researchers will be able to collect data in natural production environments that were previously only obtainable under controlled experimental conditions with a limited number of animals. Key words: Electronic identification, beef, traceback, radio frequency identification
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have