Abstract

Final projectile charge states are experimentally and theoretically analyzed after ${\mathrm{H}}^{+}$ ions collide with a ${\mathrm{C}}_{60}$ monolayer deposited on Cu(111) with an ample range of incoming energies (2--8 keV) in the low-energy regime. The three possible charge states (negative, positive, and neutral) are experimentally measured by using the low-energy ion scattering technique for two different collisional setups: 45\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} (90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}) and 67.5\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} (67.5\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}) incoming (exit) angles, relative to the target surface plane, with a fixed backscattering angle of 135\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}. Experimental ion fraction magnitudes and energy dependence are practically intermediate between that found in pristine Cu(111) and a thick ${\mathrm{C}}_{60}$ film, revealing the influence of the substrate on the final charge state of the projectile. Unlike these previous systems, the positive and negative ions contribute nearly evenly to the total scattered charged particles. On the theoretical side, we applied a first-principles based model that considers the fine details of the surface under analysis and assumes a projectile trajectory corresponding to a single binary collision with the more exposed carbon atoms of the ${\mathrm{C}}_{60}$ molecule. The theoretical and experimental results are independently compared with the already reported cases: ${\mathrm{H}}^{+}$ on a thick ${\mathrm{C}}_{60}$ film, ${\mathrm{H}}^{+}$ on Cu(111), and ${\mathrm{H}}^{+}$ on graphite. A detailed analysis of the electronic surface band structure allows us to draw a conclusion about the relevance of the substrate in the present system and about the aspects to be improved in our theoretical description. The contrast between experimental and theoretical results allows us to infer that trajectories involving ion penetration and multiple scattering events are particularly relevant for the projectile-target charge exchange process studied.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.