Abstract

To test the integrity of the sacral neuromuscular system, the concentric needle electromyogram (EMG) is suggested as the established method to provide information on denervation and reinnervation. The electrophysiologically recorded bulbocavernosus reflex is more sensitive than the clinically performed test; its latency is, however, not a sensitive test to assess axonal lesions. Pudendal cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) can be considered promising in patients with conus involvement. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) in perineal muscles can only be considered investigational. True sensitivity and specificity of uroneurophysiological tests is difficult to establish due to the lack of a 'gold standard' test to define the underlying neurological lesion. Therefore, good (age stratified) reference values have to be established.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.