Electrochemical Hydrogenation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Abstract

Electrochemical hydrogenation (ECH) of bio-mass derived compounds is an attractive alternative to traditional thermochemical hydrogenation (TCH) methods that are used in the U.S. chemical and petroleum industries to produce value-added fuels and chemicals. TCH uses high pressures and temperatures, along with an external source of hydrogen gas typically produced via methane reformation, in order to achieve hydrogenation; these requirements make it an energy intensive process. ECH has the advantages of operating near ambient conditions and sourcing the participating hydrogen from the aqueous electrolyte solution, resulting in reduced energy costs and CO2 emissions compared to TCH. Furthermore, the applied potential provides an additional parameter for controlling selectivity, making ECH more suitable to handle the wide chemical variability of biomass-derived feedstocks.Aromatic hydrocarbons are of interest as model compounds for lignocellulosic bio-oil [1]. The ECH of aromatic hydrocarbons proceeds with high faradaic efficiency (FE) at low overpotentials, however, the ECH turnover rate remains low at these potentials. There is no simple fix to this, as any increase in overpotential in an attempt to increase the degree hydrogenation will reduce the reaction FE, due to competition with the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). In this work we address the need for a more fundamental understanding of ECH systems to promote high turnover rates at low overpotentials. In phenol TCH, it is well known that the hydrogenation is limited by the formation/addition of surface adsorbed hydrogen. The current ECH literature draws on these TCH studies and assumes that phenol ECH is also limited by surface adsorbed hydrogen [2]. Thus, most ECH work is done is acidic media, where the kinetics of surface adsorbed hydrogen formation are fastest on platinum [3]. HER, however, is also faster on platinum in acidic media [4], making it more difficult to achieve high faradaic efficiency.We have investigated the ECH of phenol in aqueous electrolyte at varying pH (1, 3, 11, and 13) on low-index single crystal platinum electrodes using rotating disk electrode voltammetry. We have also included the ECH of acetophenone and benzaldehyde to compare the effect of different functionalities on the phenyl ring. The conversion and faradaic efficiency have been determined for these molecules at pH 1 and pH 11 at selected potentials. In this poster we will present new insights on the ECH reaction mechanism of aromatic hydrocarbons along with methods to promote higher ECH rates at low overpotentials.[1] J. Yan et al., "Characterizing Variability in Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review," ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 8, no. 22, pp. 8059-8085, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06263.[2] N. Singh et al., "Aqueous phase catalytic and electrocatalytic hydrogenation of phenol and benzaldehyde over platinum group metals," Journal of Catalysis, vol. 382, pp. 372-384, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.034.[3] S. Intikhab, J. D. Snyder, and M. H. Tang, "Adsorbed Hydroxide Does Not Participate in the Volmer Step of Alkaline Hydrogen Electrocatalysis," ACS Catalysis, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 8314-8319, 2017, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02787.[4] I. Ledezma-Yanez, W. D. Z. Wallace, P. Sebastián-Pascual, V. Climent, J. M. Feliu, and M. T. M. Koper, "Interfacial water reorganization as a pH-dependent descriptor of the hydrogen evolution rate on platinum electrodes," Nature Energy, vol. 2, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.31.