Abstract
The two systems ‘Assisted Resonance’ (AR) and ‘Multi-Channel Reverberation’ (MCR) are compared using supplementary criteria to the classical reverberation time, T 60 . The AR system is effective at lengthening low frequency reverberation although, owing to the very narrow bandwidth of each channel, it does not increase the early decay time. The MCR system, in which each channel covers a broad frequency range, may be designed to increase the energy in all time intervals of a room's response. However, owing to the risk of uncontrolled feedback the influence on this response is rather limited. Furthermore, variations of the total power loop gain with frequency result in reverberation times fluctuating with frequency. Overall, the AR and MCR systems appear to complement each other: AR giving optimal results at low frequencies (below 150 Hz) and MCR at medium and high frequencies (above 250 Hz).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
