Abstract

Three major perceived disadvantages of plug-in electric vehicles are limited driving range, slow recharge time, and availability of charging infrastructure. While increasing PEV range through larger and more efficient batteries may assuage concerns, public PEV charging infrastructure is required to increase the feasibility of widespread PEV adoption. In particular, Level 3 electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) can refuel a depleted PEV battery to 80% state of charge in half an hour. This work examines details of exact electric utility costs incurred by the operator of a public Level 3 EVSE used to refuel PEVs that perform two of the most common types of travel: driving to work and driving to shop. Both 44kW and 120kW EVSE refueling rates are considered. Utility rate models for Southern California are used to determine the cost of electricity. Cooperative game theory is then used to determine of the electrical demand charge incurred by each individual PEV that is charged. Results show that approximately 28–38% of typical travel results in a battery state of charge low enough to be eligible for Level 3 refueling. At low PEV total use, electric utility demand charges comprise an extremely high portion of electricity costs. Increasing PEV total use decreases demand charge contributions to the electricity costs, but must be coupled with parking management, such as valet parking, when dwell time at the destination is long (e.g., at work). Total energy costs to operate 44kW Level 3 EVSE exceed $1 per kWh at low PEV use, but decrease as PEV use increases. The lowest costs occurred at the highest level of PEV use examined, resulting in a total energy cost of approximately $0.20 per kWh during the summer and $0.13 per kWh during the winter. Parking management may be avoided if multiple EVSE are installed, which is particularly effective in improving access for travel with a short dwell time (e.g., while shopping). Increasing EVSE refueling rate improves access to PEV refueling only if parking management is implemented, but always increases demand charges.

Highlights

  • Three major perceived disadvantages of plug-in electric vehicles (PEV) are limited range, slow recharging time [1], and availability of charging infrastructure [2,3]

  • Between 100 and 150 trips per month must be made by PEVs that are compatible with Level 3 electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) and have a battery state of charge below 80% to reduce average demand charge costs below $1.00 per kW h

  • The results presented in this paper are specific to utilities that have rate structures for PEV charging similar to Southern California Edison

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three major perceived disadvantages of plug-in electric vehicles (PEV) are limited range, slow recharging time [1], and availability of charging infrastructure [2,3]. Been made toward improving PEV range and charging infrastructure in an effort to overcome these perceived barriers to widespread PEV adoption [4]. R.J. Flores et al / Applied Energy 169 (2016) 813–830 while increasing battery size may assuage concerns regarding PEVs, some public EVSE capable of providing power beyond what is available from a typical electric socket (i.e., Level 3 charging) can increase the feasibility of widespread PEV adoption [6]. Many aspects of Level 3 EVSE are currently being investigated

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call