Abstract
Ferroelectric Pb(Zr0.5Ti0.5)O3 and Pb0.99[(Zr0.6Sn0.4)0.85Ti0.15]0.98Nb0.02O3 and antiferroelectric PbZrO3 and Pb0.99[(Zr0.6Sn0.4)0.97Ti0.03]0.98Nb0.02O3 thin films were prepared by a sol-gel process. The antiferroelectric thin films showed much less electric fatigue than the ferroelectric thin films. This can be attributed to the fect that the antiferroelectrics have less stress due to 180° domain switching compared to the ferroelectrics. The ferroelectric thin films showed different fatigue mechanism. The electrical defects, such as oxygen vacancies, would be the main contributor to the fatigue of the Pb(Zr0.5Ti0.5)O3 films, while mechanical microcracking would be the main contributor to the fatigue of the Pb0.99[(Zr0.6Sn0.4)0.85Ti0.15]0.98Nb0.02O3 films. The schematic fatigue models of these different thin films were proposed to complement the proposed fatigue mechanisms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
