Abstract

AbstractUnconscious plagiarism occurs when individuals claim previously experienced ideas as their own. Using an adaptation of Brown and Murphy's (1989) three‐stage paradigm, participant elaboration was investigated using the Alternate Uses Test at generation. Following generation, ideas were imagined and rated (imagery‐elaboration), improved in three ways (generative‐elaboration), improved by another participant and then imagined and rated (rich imagery‐elaboration) or not re‐presented. A week later, participants recalled their original ideas and generated new ideas. Relative to control, elaborating or imagining an idea previously generated by someone else improved recall and reduced plagiarism in the generate‐new task. However, in the recall‐own task, generative‐elaboration alone led to high levels of plagiarism in the recall‐own task. Consequently, it is the generative nature of the elaboration performed on an idea that influences later idea appropriation. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.