Abstract
The Weimar Republic witnessed four giants in constitutional theory: Carl Schmitt, Rudolf Smend, Hermann Heller and Hans Kelsen. Each of them saw the nexus of state and constitution differently. Their discussion ended with the Nazi's seizure of power. The article analyzes their enduring influence on German constitutional law and theory. At the beginning of the Federal Republic Schmitt and Smend prevailed and developed schools which influenced even the Federal Constitutional Court. 1968 brought a revival of Heller, and today Kelsen is dominating the scene. What accounts for these shifts? Why is in our days Kelsen apparently more attractive than Smend or Schmitt and what does this tell us about the development of German constitutional law? Lepsius' article tries to answer these questions and sheds a light on the major intellectual discussions and there theoretical underpinnings in German constitutional law from the 1950s to the 1990s. Submission date: 07/01/2008 Acceptance date: 15/03/2008
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
