Abstract
From the basic law principle (eliminating the power of disposition granted to owners of those lands that contain specific mineral substances), the author analyzes the two systems of laws governing exploration of minerals on public domain land which have existed in history and comparative law. On the one hand, there is the royalty system (regalia), in which the minerals are owned in rerum natura by the State. On the other hand, the system provides free access to discover and develop the mines and State ownership is unknown. In this work, we try to prove that the evolution from one system to another can clearly be observed in Chile since the royalty system, which indeed appears to rule, is no more that a literal shell and does no more than implying a general prohibi- tion previous to the development of the mines. The underlying condition is to be granted a mining concession. A concession is also, formally speaking, a discretionary docu- ment (as all concessions seem to be), even though, this is really a permit, where very little discretion can be used, if any. According to the principles of priority and legality, the claimants have a real and effective right (in civil law systems, a so-called subjective right) to be granted the authorization to discover and develop the minerals.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call