Abstract

The conduct of enforcement or persecution can call it "Conduct of harassment", which is of particular interest for the right to work in the cases in which a siege within the employment relationship and harassment occurs and during its term, distinguishing between harassment or workplace harassment and harassment or sexual harassment, hypothesis prejudicial for those involved in the relationship of work and in particular of fundamental rights. While attitudes in both institutions have sorne overlap (siege of the hechor, absence of consent ofthe victim and the prejudice in employment or occupation), relevant differences are recognized. Thus, in the workplace harassment, harassment not aims to obtain a sexual favor, and must also have a certain regularity or more or less extended duration in time. lnstead, in the sexual harassment a single fact that magazine sufficient severity can satisfy the illicit labour, without requiring a repeated or more or less prolonged duration. The work develops both hypotheses of harassment labour, referring to its regulation, concept, violation of fundamental rights and other violations, element, features and reception of these institutions in the jurisprudence and doctrine.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.