Abstract

Losses in water distribution systems can be between several percent in well maintained systems up to more than 50 percent in developing countries. Most of the losses originate from leaks. Therefore, a fast detection and localization of leaks is crucial for effectively reducing this losses in water distribution networks. Model-based leak localization has become increasingly popular in recent years. Certainly, the performance of these methods is linked to 1) the measurement locations in the system and 2) uncertainties at these locations. This paper provides a methodology that incorporates uncertainties of different types and sources in the optimal sensor placement problem for leak localization shown by the example of the effect of demand uncertainties on potential pressure measurement points. The problem is solved for different numbers of sensors and different strengths of uncertainties are taken into account. Additionally, to describe the relation between the number of sensors and the leak localization quality, a cost-benefit function is derived based on the different sensor placement results and GoF statistics. It was found that the function follows a power law. Results show that incorporating uncertainties leads to other optimal positions than without uncertainties, but the power law behavior still stays true. Additionally, more sensors are needed than without uncertainties.

Highlights

  • In well maintained water distribution systems (WDS), only 3 - 7 % of water is lost

  • The effect of demand uncertainties on possible pressure measurement points is investigated according to Section 2.3

  • This paper set out to determine the effect of MOUs on optimal sensor placement (OSP) for leak localization in a real-world network

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In well maintained water distribution systems (WDS), only 3 - 7 % of water is lost. Though in developing countries this number can go up to 50 % and more (Colombo et al 2009). Most of the lost water originates from leaks. Water loss reduction through locating and repairing leaks in WDS is becoming increasingly important. In terms of leak localization water utilities follow two different approaches, the active and passive leakage control (Puust et al 2010). In case of the passive approach, the utility waits until customers report leaks because they experience supply problems or leakages find their way to the surface and become visible. Not all leaks become visible leading to high unreported leaks and to high total water losses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call