Abstract

Neural codes have been postulated to build efficient representations of the external world. The hippocampus, an encoding system, employs neuronal firing rates and spike phases to encode external space. Although the biophysical origin of such codes is at a single neuronal level, the role of neural components in efficient coding is not understood. The complexity of this problem lies in the dimensionality of the parametric space encompassing neural components, and is amplified by the enormous biological heterogeneity observed in each parameter. A central question that spans encoding systems therefore is how neurons arrive at efficient codes in the face of widespread biological heterogeneities. To answer this, we developed a conductance-based spiking model for phase precession, a phase code of external space exhibited by hippocampal place cells. Our model accounted for several experimental observations on place cell firing and electrophysiology: the emergence of phase precession from exact spike timings of conductance-based models with neuron-specific ion channels and receptors; biological heterogeneities in neural components and excitability; the emergence of subthreshold voltage ramp, increased firing rate, enhanced theta power within the place field; a signature reduction in extracellular theta frequency compared to its intracellular counterpart; and experience-dependent asymmetry in firing-rate profile. We formulated phase-coding efficiency, using Shannon's information theory, as an information maximization problem with spike phase as the response and external space within a single place field as the stimulus. We employed an unbiased stochastic search spanning an 11-dimensional neural space, involving thousands of iterations that accounted for the biophysical richness and neuron-to-neuron heterogeneities. We found a small subset of models that exhibited efficient spatial information transfer through the phase code, and investigated the distinguishing features of this subpopulation at the parametric and functional scales. At the parametric scale, which spans the molecular components that defined the neuron, several nonunique parametric combinations with weak pairwise correlations yielded models with similar high phase-coding efficiency. Importantly, placing additional constraints on these models in terms of matching other aspects of hippocampal neural responses did not hamper parametric degeneracy. We provide quantitative evidence demonstrating this parametric degeneracy to be a consequence of a many-to-one relationship between the different parameters and phase-coding efficiency. At the functional scale, involving the cellular-scale neural properties, our analyses revealed an important higher-order constraint that was exclusive to models exhibiting efficient phase coding. Specifically, we found a counterbalancing negative correlation between neuronal gain and the strength of external synaptic inputs as a critical functional constraint for the emergence of efficient phase coding. These observations implicate intrinsic neural properties as important contributors in effectuating such counterbalance, which can be achieved by recruiting nonunique parametric combinations. Finally, we show that a change in afferent statistics, manifesting as input asymmetry onto these neuronal models, induced an adaptive shift in the phase code that preserved its efficiency. Together, our analyses unveil parametric degeneracy as a mechanism to harness widespread neuron-to-neuron heterogeneity towards accomplishing stable and efficient encoding, provided specific higher-order functional constraints on the relationship of neural gain to external inputs are satisfied.

Highlights

  • Biological neural systems encode environmental stimuli in the process of eliciting behavioral responses

  • We demonstrate that our model accounted for several signature electrophysiological characteristics of place cells within their respective place fields, including phase precession, the emergence of subthreshold voltage ramp, increased firing rate, enhanced theta power, and a signature reduction in extracellular theta frequency compared to its intracellular counterpart

  • When we plotted the parameters associated with these five models [Fig. 2(d)], we found a lack of any clustering in the parametric combinations that resulted in these highly efficient models with very similar phase precession

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Biological neural systems encode environmental stimuli in the process of eliciting behavioral responses. We adapted Shannon’s entropy formulation and defined the maximization of mutual information between spatial stimulus and phase response to characterize high efficiency This formulation allowed us to quantitatively assess information transfer efficiency of the phase code in hippocampal pyramidal neurons, in response to the afferent inputs that are dependent on the spatial location of the animal within a single place field. A neuron could employ disparate parametric combinations of components at the molecular level to drive a well-defined synergistic balance between components at a cellular level to achieve efficient phase coding We demonstrate that this parametric degeneracy [34,35] was intact even when we placed additional constraints on neural response properties and was a consequence of a many-to-one mapping between the parametric and functional spaces. These conclusions unveil parametric degeneracy as a potent mechanism that enables several nonunique routes to achieve efficient coding while concomitantly maintaining homeostasis in neural excitability

DEFINING PHASE-CODING EFFICIENCY
Model description
Synaptically driven inputs and population activity of place cells
Assignment of spike phases
Computing phase-coding efficiency of a model neuron
PARAMETRIC DEGENERACY IN THE EXPRESSION OF EFFICIENT PHASE CODING
EXPLORING STRUCTURE IN THE PARAMETRIC AND THE MEASUREMENT SPACES
Parametric space
Measurement space
IMPACT OF CHANGES IN SYNAPTIC INPUT STRUCTURE ON THE PHASE CODE
DISCUSSION
Degeneracy in efficient coding and excitability robustness
Models for phase precession
Limitations of our model and future directions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.