Abstract

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) account for a large portion of the global health burden and are one of the main causes of decease worldwide. In the classification and forecasting of CVDs, Machine Learning (ML) techniques have demonstrated encouraging outcomes. In this research report, a comparative analysis of classification and prediction models for CVD is presented, including both linear and ensemble ML approaches. The paper compares ensemble models like Catboost, Histogram Gradient Boosting Machine (HGBM), and Extra Trees against linear models like Gaussian Nave Bayes, SVM, and KNN. The objective is to identify the most effective CVD prediction model by assessing its performance through accuracy, precision, sensitivity and F1 score as key evaluation metrics. Moreover, results show that ensemble models outperform linear models using advanced techniques such as boosting and histogram-based algorithms. The results underscore the critical role ensemble models play in accurately diagnosing and predicting cardiovascular disease and provide important new information to researchers and healthcare providers. Using these models has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes and health management by enabling early detection and intervention

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call