Abstract
Abstract Background Concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is a disease where incidence increases with age and can have serious complications such as pancreatitis, cholangitis and liver abscesses, but its management is controversial, because there are minimally invasive laparoscopic and endoscopic surgical procedures. Objective To compare the efficiency in the management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis with laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration vs. cholangiopancreatography endoscopic retrograde + laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and method Retrospective analysis of a five year observational, cross sectional multicenter study of patients with cholelithiasis and concomitant high risk of choledocholithiasis who were divided into two groups and the efficiency of both procedures was compared. Group 1 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration and group 2 underwent cholangiopancreatography endoscopic retrograde + laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results 40 patients, 20 were included in each group, we found p = 0.10 in terms of operating time; when we compared hospital days we found p = 0.63; the success of stone extraction by study group we obtained was p = 0.15; the complications presented by group was p = 0.1 and the number of hospitalizations by group was p ≤ 0.05 demonstrating statistical significance. Conclusions Both approaches have the same efficiency in the management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis in terms of operating time, success in extracting stone, days of hospitalization, postoperative complications and conversion to open surgery. However the laparoscopic approach is favourable because it reduces the number of surgical anaesthetic events and the number of hospital admissions.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call