Efficiency of ionic liquids for chemical enhanced oil recovery

Abstract

Substantial amount of crude oil remains in the reservoir after primary and secondary production. Chemical flooding is one of the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods; however, chemicals (i.e., Surfactant) used are sensitive to the harsh environment characterizing the local reservoirs. The current study aimed at investigating the utilization of ionic liquids (ILs), known as environment friendly salt with good solubility, thermal stability and effective surface activity, as an alternative to conventional organic surfactants in enhanced oil recovery process. In this work, screening tests of nine ILs were performed. These ILs were diluted in different brine solutions of different salt compositions at 10 % (w/w) salinity and their solubility, thermal stability and surface activity in presence of Saudi medium crude oil were tested. Tetra alkyl ammonium sulfate known as Ammoeng 102 was found to be the ionic liquid of choice. Further investigations on Ammoeng 102 solutions at 10 and 20 % (w/w) salinity were conducted and IFT measurements indicate enhanced surface activity of Ammoeng 102 with increasing solution salinity. Effects of pressure and temperature on interfacial tension (IFT) were also tested and the results indicate minor effects. Adsorption test indicates high Ammoeng 102 adsorption tendency with more adsorption for higher salinity solution. Different flooding scenarios were conducted in sandstone rock samples to investigate the effectiveness of Ammoeng 102 IL as an EOR chemical. The findings indicate promising results for ionic solution flooding in secondary mode at irreducible water saturation (S wirr). Ultimate recovery obtained is higher than that obtained with combined secondary brine flooding followed by tertiary ionic solution flooding at residual oil saturation (S or). Injection of slug of ionic solution in secondary mode provides lower recovery compared to that recovered with continuous ionic solution injection in the same mode. Rock water content affects recovery efficiency indicating higher oil recovery for secondary brine and tertiary ionic solution flooding at low S wirr. Contact angle and relative permeability measurements demonstrate the role of wettability alteration behind the extra oil recovery which is very much affected by ionic liquid concentration that can be altered by dilution with formation and injected brines.