Abstract

Mother-to-child transmission is the major cause of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This double-blind trial tested the effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in preventing vertical transmission. Pregnant women who were HBsAg/HBeAg-positive with a HBV DNA titer ≥ 2×106 IU/mL were randomly assigned to the control (n = 60) and TDF-treated (n = 60) groups. TDF treatment (oral dose 300 mg/day) was initiated at 24 weeks of gestation and continued to 4 weeks after delivery. The subjects were followed up to 28 weeks postpartum. The effects of TDF on vertical transmission, outcomes of the mothers and infants and virological changes were monitored. TDF dynamically reduced the serum HBV DNA level of the mothers, particularly during the first 4 weeks of treatment. The lower viral loads were maintained in the pregnancies until delivery. Approximately 90% and 33.9% of the TDF-treated mothers had viral loads ≤2000 IU/mL after delivery and at 28 weeks postpartum, respectively. No cervical transmission or adverse effects were observed in the TDF-treated individuals, whereas 13.5% of the infants were infected with HBV in the control group. We conclude that TDF treatment initiated at 24 weeks of gestation in high-viremia, HBsAg/HBeAg-positive mothers efficiently prevents mother-to-child HBV transmission without adverse events in mothers and infants.

Highlights

  • In the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment group, one abortion occurred at 12 weeks of gestation, and the other 59 pregnancies accepted TDF therapy

  • 1 case of premature delivery occurred at 32 weeks of gestation, and the premature infants died from hypoxic brain disease

  • Perinatal transmission is a major cause of this chronic infection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Paired comparisons between the patients who received TDF treatment showed that the serum HBV DNA level decreased by 4.82 ± 0.94 log[10] IU/mL from 24 weeks of gestation to delivery (p < 0.001, supplementary Table). None of the infants from the TDF-treated mothers were positive for HBsAg, HBeAg or HBV DNA, which was a marked difference compared to those of the control group (p < 0.05).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call