Efficacy and Safety of Shenfu Injection on Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThe adjunctive efficacy and safety of Shenfu Injection (SFI) for acute heart failure (AHF) still remains ambiguous even though previous studies made initial conclusions. ObjectiveTo comprehensively evaluate the adjunctive efficacy and safety of SFI in the treatment of AHF. Study designThis was a meta-analysis and systematic review. Methods8 databases were searched for qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from May 1990 to May 2022. The primary results included total clinical effective rate (TCER) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The secondary results included left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), heart rate (HR), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and adverse events (AE). The quality evaluation, meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and publication bias were conducted by RevMan5.3 software. Meta-regression analysis was conducted using Stata software 15.0, and trial sequential analyses (TSA) was performed by TSA program. Finally, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system was applied for evaluating the quality of evidence. Results61 RCTs containing 5505 AHF patients were included. The meta results demonstrated SFI combined with conventional western treatment (CWT) for AHF was superior to CWT alone in improving the TCER (RR = 1.21; 95% CI (1.18, 1.24); p < 0.001), improving LVEF (SMD = 0.85; 95% CI (0.77,0.92); p < 0.001) and reducing HR (SMD = -0.67; 95% CI (0.80, -0.54) p < 0.001). It had a lower AE rate in the SFI+CWT group (27/753, 3.59%) than the CWT group (68/739, 9.20%) (RR = 0.40; 95% CI (0.26, 0.61); p < 0.001). The outcomes’ evidentiary quality of TCER, HR, LVEF and AE were assessed as moderate. ConclusionAdjunctive use of SFI was safer to improve TCER and heart function of AHF, but the results should be interpreted with cautious for clinical practice until high quality-designed RCTs were require for further confirmation due to poor quality of part of the included studies.