Abstract
Invasive fungal infections are a potentially life-threatening complication in immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of posaconazole as compared with other antifungal agents for preventing invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Embase, CENTRAL, and MEDLINE were searched for randomized conweekmonthtrolled trials (RCTs) up to June 2020. A systematic review with meta-analysis of RCTs was performed using random-effects model. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted for the primary outcome to assess random errors. A total of five RCTs with 1,617 participants were included. Posaconazole prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower risk of IFIs (RR, 0.43 [95% CI 0.28 to 0.66, p = 0.0001]) as compared to other antifungal agents. No heterogeneity was identified between studies (I2 = 0%). No significant associations were observed for the secondary outcomes measured, including risk reduction of invasive aspergillosis and candidiasis, clinical failure, all-cause mortality, and treatment-related adverse events, except for infection-related mortality (RR, 0.31 [95% CI 0.15 to 0.64, p = 0.0001]). Subgroup analysis favoured posaconazole over fluconazole for the prevention of IFIs (RR, 0.44 [95% CI 0.28 to 0.70, p = 0.0004]). TSA confirmed the prophylactic benefit of posaconazole against IFIs. Posaconazole is effective in preventing IFIs among immunocompromised patients, particularly those with hematologic malignancies and recipients of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Highlights
Invasive fungal infections are a potentially life-threatening complication in immunocompromised patients
In view of the substantial disease burden associated with IFIs, primary antifungal prophylaxis is crucial in patients at high risk of prolonged neutropenia
The objective of the current systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was to provide reliable estimates on the efficacy and safety of posaconazole from randomized conweekmonthtrolled trials (RCTs) to facilitate evidence-based decision-making on its prophylactic use in immunocompromised patients
Summary
Invasive fungal infections are a potentially life-threatening complication in immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of posaconazole as compared with other antifungal agents for preventing invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Posaconazole prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower risk of IFIs (RR, 0.43 [95% CI 0.28 to 0.66, p = 0.0001]) as compared to other antifungal agents. Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain a significant health threat in immunocompromised individuals, including blood cancer patients and transplant r ecipients[1,2]. In view of the substantial disease burden associated with IFIs, primary antifungal prophylaxis is crucial in patients at high risk of prolonged neutropenia. The objective of the current systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was to provide reliable estimates on the efficacy and safety of posaconazole from RCTs to facilitate evidence-based decision-making on its prophylactic use in immunocompromised patients
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
