Abstract
ObjectiveNoninvasive ventilation, including nasal high-flow therapy (nHFT), provides effective neonatal respiratory support. There are limited data on nHFT use during neonatal transport. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of nHFT during neonatal transport. MethodsOne hundred ninety-five neonates transported on nHFT via a Neo-Pod “T” system (Westmed Inc, Tucson, AZ) were identified from Life Flight transport data. Data included demographics, transport location, distance, indication, and mode as well as pretransport and intratransport respiratory support data. We compared neonates who successfully tolerated nHFT transport with those who required support escalation (defined as increase in flow ≥2 L/min or fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] ≥20%). ResultsEighty-seven percent of neonates (170/195) were effectively transported on nHFT. Infants requiring escalation of nHFT support had a significantly higher pretransport FiO2 (median = 0.60 [interquartile range, 0.36-1.00] vs. 0.36 [0.23-0.56]; P < .05) and a longer ground time for stabilization (56 ± 25 vs. 39 ± 18 minutes, P < .05) and were more frequently transported by air. ConclusionNasal HFT can be an effective mode of respiratory support in the transport of selected neonates. FiO2 at the time of transport may be a key parameter to aid in determining neonates who can be safely transported on nHFT.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
