Abstract

ObjectiveThis study was designed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of once-daily lurasidone (80mg/day and 160mg/day) in the treatment of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. MethodsParticipants, who were recently admitted inpatients with schizophrenia with an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms, were randomly assigned to 6weeks of fixed-dose, double-blind treatment with lurasidone 80mg (n=125), lurasidone 160mg (n=121), quetiapine XR 600mg (QXR-600mg; n=119; active control included to test for assay sensitivity), or placebo (n=121), all dosed once daily in the evening. Efficacy was evaluated using a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of the change from Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (the primary efficacy measure) and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score (the key secondary efficacy measure). ResultsTreatment with both doses of lurasidone or with QXR-600mg was associated with significantly greater improvement at Week 6 on PANSS total score, PANSS positive and negative subscale scores, and CGI-S score compared with placebo. The endpoint responder rate (≥20% improvement in PANSS total score) was higher in subjects treated with lurasidone 80mg (65%; p<0.001), lurasidone 160mg (79%; p<0.001), and QXR-600mg (79%; p<0.001) compared with placebo (41%). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥7% weight gain was 4% for each lurasidone group, 15% for the QXR-600mg group, and 3% for the placebo group. Endpoint changes in levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were comparable for both lurasidone groups and placebo, while the QXR-600mg group showed a significant median increase compared with the placebo group in levels of cholesterol (p<0.001), LDL cholesterol (p<0.01), and triglycerides (p<0.05). ConclusionsLurasidone 80mg and 160mg doses administered once-daily in the evening, were safe and effective treatments for subjects with acute schizophrenia, with increased response rates observed at the higher dose. Dose-related adverse effects were limited, and both doses were generally well-tolerated.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call