Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in real-world psoriasis management: data from patients who are biologic-naive vs. biologic-experienced.

Abstract

Bimekizumab is the latest monoclonal antibody approved for the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Currently, data investigating its use in real-world settings are limited. To assess the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, also comparing patients who are biologic-naive vs. biologic-experienced. A short-term (16 weeks) real-world monocentric prospective study was undertaken. Globally, 56 patients were included. At baseline, mean Psoriasis Activity Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were 16.9 (SD 7.8) and 22.6 (SD 5.9), respectively. A ≥ 75%/≥ 90%/100% reduction in PASI (PASI 75/90/100) were reached by 77% (43/56)/50% (28/56)/43% (43/56) of patients at week 4 and by 88% (49/56)/82% (46/56)/70% (39/56) of patients at week 16. In our cohort of 56 people, 29 (52%) patients were biologic-naive whereas 27 (48%) were biologic-experienced. At baseline, both PASI and DLQI were significantly higher in the biologic-naive group compared with the biologic-experienced group [PASI 19.4 (SD 7.7) vs. 14.2 (SD 7.0), P < 0.05; DLQI: 25.3 (SD 4.5) vs. 19.7 (SD 6.0), P < 0.001]. Although not significant, a higher percentage of patients in the biologic-naive group compared with the biologic-experienced group reached PASI 75 (79% vs. 63%, P = 0.18), PASI 90 (62% vs. 44%, P = 0.19) and PASI 100 (48% vs. 37%, P = 0.40) at week 4. However, the percentage of PASI 75/90/100 response were similar between the two groups at week 16. Regarding safety, three candidiasis (5%) and one (2%) eczematous reaction were reported, without differences between the two groups. Finally, two (4%) bimekizumab discontinuation because of treatment failure and three (5%) for AEs were collected. Our study confirmed the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, suggesting that the previous failure of biologics does not seem to affect its therapeutic effectiveness.