Abstract
BackgroundThe efficacies of prism adaptation test (PAT) and monocular occlusion (MO) and their optimal test durations to detect the maximum angles of deviation at near and distance in eyes with intermittent exotropia (IXT) were assessed and compared.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 72 patients with IXT. All the patients had undergone the initial strabismus surgery between April 2015 and October 2018 and had been preoperatively tested by both PAT and MO performed on different days for 30 and 60 min. Near and distance deviations after 30 and 60 min of PAT and MO were compared to their baseline measurements obtained immediately after prism wear and before occlusion by alternate prism cover test. The near/distance measurements and required test duration to reveal the maximum deviation angle were also compared between PAT and MO.ResultsCompared with the baseline, the near deviation by PAT significantly increased after 30 (P < 0.05) and 60 (P < 0.01) minutes but not the distance deviation. However, the increase after 30 min was not significant. By MO, neither near nor distance deviation showed a significant difference from the baseline after 30 and 60 min. PAT showed a significantly larger near deviation than MO at 30 and 60 min, but a larger distance deviation by PAT was only observed at 30 min.ConclusionsIn patients with basic and convergence insufficiency types of IXT, a 30-minute PAT appears to be more effective than MO in revealing the maximum angle of deviation before strabismus surgery.
Highlights
The efficacies of prism adaptation test (PAT) and monocular occlusion (MO) and their optimal test durations to detect the maximum angles of deviation at near and distance in eyes with intermittent exotropia (IXT) were assessed and compared
This study aimed to compare the efficacies of preoperative PAT and MO for detecting the maximum angle of deviation within the same test duration (60 min) and to determine the optimal test durations for both methods
Significant differences in near and distance deviations were only observed at 30 min and no significant difference between both methods was seen after 30 min
Summary
The efficacies of prism adaptation test (PAT) and monocular occlusion (MO) and their optimal test durations to detect the maximum angles of deviation at near and distance in eyes with intermittent exotropia (IXT) were assessed and compared. Revealing the true deviation will be difficult if fusion cannot be sufficiently removed during APCT. The reported influences of tenacious proximal fusion (TPF) [6] (Scobee phenomenon [7]) and tenacious distance fusion [5] can prevent IXT patients from revealing the true deviation during APCT. Other than APCT, a method that can measure the maximum angle of deviation before strabismus surgery is clinically essential to the management of IXT
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have