Abstract

Assessments of ship-strike risk for large whales typically use a single year of ship traffic data and averaged predictions of species distributions. Consequently, they do not account for variability in ship traffic or species distributions. Variability could reduce the effectiveness of static management measures designed to mitigate ship-strike risk. We explore the consequences of interannual variability on ship-strike risk using multiple years of both ship traffic data and predicted fin, humpback, and blue whale distributions off California. Specifically, risk was estimated in four regions that are important for ship-strike risk management. We estimated risk by multiplying the predicted number of whales by the cumulative distance travelled by ships. To overcome the temporal mismatch between the ship traffic and whale data available off California, we classified the time series of ship traffic data into nearshore and offshore traffic scenarios using the percentage of ship traffic travelling more than 24nmi from the mainland coast, which was the boundary of a clean fuel rule implemented in 2009 that altered ship traffic patterns. We found that risk for fin and humpback whale populations off California increased as these species recovered from whaling. We also found that broad-scale, northward shifts in blue whale distributions throughout the North Pacific, likely in response to changes in oceanographic conditions, were associated with increased ship-strike risk off northern California. The magnitude of ship-strike risk for fin, humpback, and blue whales was influenced by the ship traffic scenarios. Interannual variability in predicted whale distributions also influenced the magnitude of ship-strike risk, but generally did not change whether the nearshore or offshore traffic scenario had higher risk. The consistency in the highest risk from the traffic scenarios likely occurred because areas containing the highest predicted number of whales were generally the same across years. The consistency in risk from the traffic scenarios suggests that static spatial management measures (e.g., changing shipping lanes or creating areas to be avoided) can provide an effective means of mitigating risk resulting from ship traffic variability off California.

Highlights

  • Ship strikes are one of the largest sources of human-caused mortality for fin (Balaenoptera physalus), humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), and blue (B. musculus) whales on the United States West Coast (Carretta et al, 2017)

  • Interannual variability in predicted whale distributions influenced the magnitude of ship-strike risk, but generally did not change the effect of the traffic scenarios on risk (Figure 5)

  • Interannual variability did not change whether the nearshore or offshore traffic scenario had higher risk

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ship strikes are one of the largest sources of human-caused mortality for fin (Balaenoptera physalus), humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), and blue (B. musculus) whales on the United States West Coast (Carretta et al, 2017). The risk of ships striking whales (hereafter, ship-strike risk) has been assessed for these species in several regions: for all three species off the entire United States West Coast (Rockwood et al, 2017) and southern California (Redfern et al, 2013, 2019), for blue whales off the entire United States West Coast (Hazen et al, 2017; Abrahms et al, 2019b), and for humpback whales off San Francisco (Dransfield et al, 2014). Use of offshore routes was found for the entire coast of California (Moore et al, 2018) and for the major California ports: San Francisco Bay (Jensen et al, 2015) and Los Angeles/Long Beach (McKenna et al, 2012)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call