Abstract
BackgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important when evaluating treatment benefits in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared upadacitinib, an oral, selective JAK-1 inhibitor, with placebo to assess clinically meaningful improvements in PROs in patients with RA who have had inadequate responses to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR).MethodsPRO responses between upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg and placebo were evaluated at week 12 from the SELECT-BEYOND trial. Improvement was determined by measuring Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), duration and severity of morning (AM) stiffness, and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Least squares mean changes and percentage of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and scores greater than or equal to normative values were determined. The number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve clinically meaningful improvements was calculated.ResultsIn 498 patients, both upadacitinib doses resulted in statistically significant changes from baseline versus placebo in PtGA, pain, HAQ-DI, SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS), 7 of 8 SF-36 domains (15 mg), 6 of 8 SF-36 domains (30 mg), and AM stiffness duration and severity. Compared with placebo, more upadacitinib-treated patients reported improvements ≥ MCID in PtGA, pain, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, 7 of 8 SF-36 domains (15 mg), 5 of 8 SF-36 domains (30 mg), AM stiffness duration and severity, and ISI (30 mg) and scores ≥ normative values in HAQ-DI and SF-36 domains. Across most PROs, NNTs to achieve MCID with upadacitinib ranged from 4 to 7 patients.ConclusionsIn bDMARD-IR RA patients, upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) improved multiple aspects of quality of life, and more patients reached clinically meaningful improvements approaching normative values compared with placebo.Trial registrationThe trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02706847), registered 6 March 2016.
Highlights
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important when evaluating treatment benefits in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
Decrements in PROs from normative values at baseline indicate that patients in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) reported substantial impairments in healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL)
Statistically significant improvements at week 12 were evident with both upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg for Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), pain visual analog scale (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Physical Component Summary (PCS), and AM stiffness
Summary
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important when evaluating treatment benefits in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, and destructive disease of the synovial joints that is associated with substantial clinical burden, reduced healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL), and shortened life expectancy [1, 2]. Patients with RA have reported that sleep disturbances are a key determinant of their well-being [3, 9,10,11] These reports are supported by cross-sectional studies, which have demonstrated that sleep disturbance correlates with greater pain, disease activity, and fatigue in RA [12,13,14,15]. Current treatment options include conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) such as methotrexate (MTX), biologic
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have