Abstract
The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon reveals a bottleneck of human information processing: the second of two targets is often missed when they are presented in rapid succession among distractors. In our previous work, we showed that the size of the AB can be changed by applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) (London & Slagter, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 756-68, 2021). Although AB size at the group level remained unchanged, the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS were negatively correlated: if a given individual's AB size decreased from baseline during anodal tDCS, their AB size would increase during cathodal tDCS, and vice versa. Here, we attempted to replicate this finding. We found no group effects of tDCS, as in the original study, but we no longer found a significant negative correlation. We present a series of statistical measures of replication success, all of which confirm that both studies are not in agreement. First, the correlation here is significantly smaller than a conservative estimate of the original correlation. Second, the difference between the correlations is greater than expected due to sampling error, and our data are more consistent with a zero-effect than with the original estimate. Finally, the overall effect when combining both studies is small and not significant. Our findings thus indicate that the effects of lDPLFC-tDCS on the AB are less substantial than observed in our initial study. Although this should be quite a common scenario, null findings can be difficult to interpret and are still under-represented in the brain stimulation and cognitive neuroscience literatures. An important auxiliary goal of this paper is therefore to provide a tutorial for other researchers, to maximize the evidential value from null findings.
Highlights
The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon clearly demonstrates that our capacity to process incoming information is overwhelmed
The summary statistics and ANOVA results for T2|T1 accuracy can be found in Tables 1 and 2
We do not consider this a genuine effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the attentional blink, because there is no clear reason why these randomized groups should differ, and because the largest difference between the anodal and cathodal session occurred in the baseline block already
Summary
The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon clearly demonstrates that our capacity to process incoming information is overwhelmed. The AB occurs when two targets are embedded in a rapidly presented stream of distractors [1] (for reviews, see [2, 3]). Replicating tDCS effects on the attentional blink available on GitHub (and from our OSF page), in the form of an R notebook detailing all the analyses that we ran for this project, along with the results. We include an Rmarkdown (Xie, Allaire, & Grolemund, 2018) source file for this paper that can be run to reproduce the pdf version of the text, along with all the figures and statistics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.