Effects of Surface Layer Physics Schemes on the Simulated Intensity and Structure of Typhoon Rai (2021)

Abstract

The influences of surface layer (SL) physics schemes on the simulated intensity and structure of Typhoon Rai (2021) are investigated using the WRF model. Numerical experiments using different SL physics schemes—revised MM5 scheme (MM5), Eta similarity scheme (CTL), and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino scheme (MYNN)—are conducted. The results show that the intensity forecast of Typhoon Rai is largely influenced by SL physics schemes, while its track forecast is not significantly affected. All three experiments can successfully capture the movement of Rai, while CTL provides better intensity simulation compared to the other two experiments. The higher ratio of enthalpy exchange coefficient to drag coefficient (CK/CD) in CTL than MM5 and MYNN leads to significantly increased surface enthalpy fluxes, which are crucial for the typhoon intensification of the former. To explore the influence of SL physics on the structural evolution of the typhoon, the azimuthal-mean angular momentum (AM) budget is utilized. The results indicate that asymmetric eddy terms may also largely contribute to the AM tendencies, which are relatively more comparable in the weaker TC for MM5, compared to the stronger TC with the dominant symmetric mean terms for CTL. Furthermore, the extended Sawyer–Eliassen (SE) equation is solved to quantify the transverse circulations of the typhoon induced by different forcing sources for CTL and MM5. The SE solution indicates that the transverse circulation above and within the boundary layer is predominantly induced by diabatic heating and turbulent friction, respectively, for both CTL and MM5, while all other physical forcing terms are relatively insignificant for the induced transverse circulation for CTL, except for the large contribution from the eddy forcing in the upper-tropospheric outflow for MM5. With the stronger connective heating in the eyewall and boundary-layer radial inflow, the linear SE analysis agrees much better with the nonlinear simulation for CTL than MM5.