Abstract
The tri-axial testing of rocks under compression is a widely popular measure for the assessment of strength of geological materials in the laboratory. In this regard, mechanical complexities of true tri-axial testing machines impel researchers to opt for simpler conventional tri-axial testing machines. To account for influential factors that affect quality of experimental data, observations derived from laboratory experiments that enable overcoming some drawbacks are presented herein. In the present study, a series of tri-axial tests on Kimachi sandstone under Conventional Tri-axial Compression (CTC), Conventional Tri-axial Extension (CTE), Reduced Tri-axial Compression (RTC), and Reduced Tri-axial Extension (RTE) conditions were carried out. The results suggested higher compressive strengths for the rock under tri-axial extension tests than the compression tests. This observation proves that the effect of intermediate confining pressure on material behavior is important and if feasible, should not be sacrificed for more economical alternatives. Generally, the loading and unloading experiments for a specific test type rendered the same results and the conventional and reduced paths in both the compression and extension tests did not affect the failure strength of the specimens. The effect of pre-existing cracks orientation with respect to the principal loading directions on crack growth was focused upon and related conclusions were subsequently drawn.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.