Abstract
Two methods of identifying the location of clicks superimposed on sentences were compared. When Ss first wrote out the entire sentence and then marked the location of the clicks, the perceived clicks tended to migrate toward the major constituent breaks of the sentences. This trend was not observed when Ss responded by marking the position of clicks on prepared scripts of the stimulus sentence. In addition, both response procedures resulted in a significant trend for the perceived clicks to be located before the actual click locations. The findings of this study resolved the conflicting results obtained from previous investigations in this area.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
