Abstract
This study reports an experimental and theoretical resolution to two seemingly contradictory findings in the literature of attentional strategies of sentence processing. Abrams and Bever (1969) reported that reaction time (RT) to brief tones located at the linguistic boundary between major sentence constituents was slower than reaction time to tones near the major break within major constituents. Holmes and Forster (1970), using different sentences and different tone locations within constituents found that RT to tones between constituents was relatively fast. The present study used practiced subjects and a frequency balancing technique that equalized the conditional probability of a tone occurring in each of four locations given that a tone had not occurred previously in the sentence. In Condition I, the instructions emphasized fast reaction time and the results looked like the findings of Abrams and Bever. In Condition II, the instructions stressed written recall accuracy and the results replicated the Holmes and Forster findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.