Abstract
IntroductionNew technology using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing has been developed to measure cardiac output. Because rebreathing increases respiratory effort, we investigated whether a newly developed system with 35 s rebreathing causes a lesser increase in respiratory effort under partial ventilatory support than does the conventional system with 50 s rebreathing. We also investigated whether the shorter rebreathing period affects the accuracy of cardiac output measurement.MethodOnce a total of 13 consecutive post-cardiac-surgery patients had recovered spontaneous breathing under pressure support ventilation, we applied a partial carbon dioxide rebreathing technique with rebreathing of 35 s and 50 s in a random order. We measured minute ventilation, and arterial and mixed venous carbon dioxide tension at the end of the normal breathing period and at the end of the rebreathing periods. We then measured cardiac output using the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing technique with the two rebreathing periods and using thermodilution.ResultsWith both rebreathing systems, minute ventilation increased during rebreathing, as did arterial and mixed venous carbon dioxide tensions. The increases in minute ventilation and arterial carbon dioxide tension were less with 35 s rebreathing than with 50 s rebreathing. The cardiac output measures with both systems correlated acceptably with values obtained with thermodilution.ConclusionWhen patients breathe spontaneously the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing technique increases minute ventilation and arterial carbon dioxide tension, but the effect is less with a shorter rebreathing period. The 35 s rebreathing period yielded cardiac output measurements similar in accuracy to those with 50 s rebreathing.
Highlights
New technology using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing has been developed to measure cardiac output
When patients breathe spontaneously the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing technique increases minute ventilation and arterial carbon dioxide tension, but the effect is less with a shorter rebreathing period
We reasoned that shortening the carbon dioxide rebreathing period would lessen the CO = cardiac output; ICU = intensive care unit; NICO2 = noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing technique; PaCO2 = arterial carbon dioxide tension; PCO2 = partial carbon dioxide tension; PETCO2 = end-tidal carbon dioxide tension; PSV = pressure support ventilation; VCO2 = carbon dioxide production; VE = minute ventilation; VT = tidal volume
Summary
New technology using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing has been developed to measure cardiac output. A partial carbon dioxide rebreathing technique has been developed to estimate cardiac output (CO) in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing surgery [1,2] or intensive care [3,4]. We reasoned that shortening the carbon dioxide rebreathing period would lessen the CO = cardiac output; ICU = intensive care unit; NICO2 = noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing technique; PaCO2 = arterial carbon dioxide tension; PCO2 = partial carbon dioxide tension; PETCO2 = end-tidal carbon dioxide tension; PSV = pressure support ventilation; VCO2 = carbon dioxide production; VE = minute ventilation; VT = tidal volume. We designed the present prospective study to investigate how, in spontaneously breathing patients, the shorter carbon dioxide rebreathing period affects respiratory effort during rebreathing and how it affects the accuracy of CO measurement
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have