Abstract
The replication-deficient orthopoxvirus modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is a promising vaccine vector against various pathogens and has an excellent safety record. However, pre-existing vector-specific immunity is frequently suggested to be a drawback of MVA-based vaccines. To address this issue, mice were vaccinated with MVA-based influenza vaccines in the presence or absence of orthopoxvirus-specific immunity. Importantly, protective efficacy of an MVA-based influenza vaccine against a homologous challenge was not impaired in the presence of orthopoxvirus-specific pre-existing immunity. Nonetheless, orthopoxvirus-specific pre-existing immunity reduced the induction of antigen-specific antibodies under specific conditions and completely prevented induction of antigen-specific T cell responses by rMVA-based vaccination. Notably, antibodies induced by vaccinia virus vaccination, both in mice and humans, were not capable of neutralizing MVA. Thus, when using rMVA-based vaccines it is important to consider the main correlate of protection induced by the vaccine, the vaccine dose and the orthopoxvirus immune status of vaccine recipients.
Highlights
Recombinant viral vectors are under development as novel vaccine candidates that induce immunity to antigens of interest expressed from transgenes
We investigated the performance of rMVA-based influenza vaccines in the presence or absence of pre-existing immunity to orthopoxviruses or influenza virus in mice and evaluated orthopoxvirus-specific immune responses after modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) or vaccinia virus (VACV) vaccination in humans
Induction of orthopoxvirus-specific antibodies upon priming mice with wtMVA or VACV was confirmed by protein array (PA) and ELISA using wtMVA- or VACV-infected cell-lysates as antigens
Summary
Recombinant viral vectors are under development as novel vaccine candidates that induce immunity to antigens of interest expressed from transgenes. Some studies in mice and macaques showed that pre-existing immunity induced by either VACV or MVA had a negative effect on the induction of antigen-specific humoral and/or cellular immune responses by rMVA-based vaccines. Results obtained in humans are contradictory: orthopoxvirus-specific immunity was boosted by multiple rMVA vaccinations and was shown to have a negative effect on the magnitude of the antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune response. In all cases individuals responded to vaccination by either initial induction or boosting of antigen-specific immunity[20,29] This indicates that rMVA-based vaccines remain immunogenic, even in the presence of vector-specific pre-existing immunity. Despite the fact that claims of potential interference by pre-existing vector immunity on immunogenicity of rMVA-based vaccines are made in the literature, the topic has not been addressed sufficiently and studies have led to contradictory results
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have