Abstract

ADOLESCENT MALE and female students from two high schools were asked to rate the academic and social characteristics of a male peer from an adjacent school district. The peer had previously been videotaped in two target roles, once playing the part of a highly competent student and once playing the role of an average ability student. In addition, half the students were told the target was gifted, the other half were told he was average. Students were asked to judge the academic potential, social attributes and personal attractiveness of the target. The dominant effect was observed under the highly competent role condition. The students judged the target who performed the competent role as likely to be more successful in academic subjects, more socially acceptable and a better leader than the less competent peer. Students rated the target labelled gifted as having higher skills in academic subjects than the target labelled average, but the labels did not affect perceptions of social attributes or personal ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.