Abstract

Geosynthetic encasement of individual stone columns can provide additional confinement to the columns thus increasing their load capacities and reducing lateral and vertical deformations. Most of past studies have been focused on the load capacities and settlements (i.e. vertical deformations) of the encased stone columns. However, the load transfer mechanism and the lateral bulging deformation pattern of the encased stone columns are not thoroughly understood. In the present study, four series of laboratory model tests in a large-scale testing tank were performed to investigate the effect of geogrid encasement on the lateral and vertical deformations of stone columns installed in a clay bed. For comparison purposes, ordinary stone columns were also tested and evaluated. The main objective of this research is to investigate the lateral and vertical deformation patterns of the encased stone columns and the reinforcement mechanisms of the geogrid encasement with different encasement lengths. In addition, the stress–strain characteristics of the encasement were measured and analysed. The test results show that the ultimate load capacity of the soft soil was greatly increased by the geogrid-encased stone columns. The effective length of the encasement was three to four times of the diameter of stone columns based on the consideration of performance and economy. In comparison with the analytical solution based on the unit cell concept with full encasement of columns, the experimental tests on composite foundations with partially encased columns, which allowed lateral deformations of columns and soils and slippage along the column-soil interfaces (geogrid–soil, stone column–geogrid, and stone column–soil if the column is not encased), resulted in larger settlements, especially at higher vertical pressures.

Highlights

  • Stone columns have been extensively used to support structures on soft soils by increasing bearing capacities, reducing settlements, accelerating consolidation, and minimising liquefaction potential of soft or liquefiable ground (Barksdale and Bachus 1983; Priebe 1995; Han and Ye 2001)

  • The results indicated that the load capacity depended upon the modulus of the encasement and the diameter of the stone columns

  • Load–settlement behaviour Figure 6 shows the applied pressure–settlement curves for ordinary stone columns (OSC) and geosyntheticencased stone columns (GESC) installed in the clay bed with an undrained shear strength of 3.4 kPa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stone columns have been extensively used to support structures on soft soils by increasing bearing capacities, reducing settlements, accelerating consolidation, and minimising liquefaction potential of soft or liquefiable ground (Barksdale and Bachus 1983; Priebe 1995; Han and Ye 2001). When the soft soils are extremely weak, the stone columns are not effective to provide their. The stone columns without any geosynthetic encasement is referred to as ordinary stone columns (OSC) whereas those with the geosynthetic encasement is referred to as the geosyntheticencased stone columns (GESC). The geosynthetic used for the encasement can be woven geotextile or geogrid. Geogrid was used in the present study. The geosynthetic encasement can be installed partially in the upper portion or fully along the whole column length (Murugesan and Rajagopal 2007; Yoo and Lee 2012)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call