Abstract
Prior studies have suggested that distraction-based treatment for early onset scoliosis (EOS) may impede the natural development of the sagittal spinal alignment and pelvic parameters. However, to date no study has investigated the effect of distal fixation on pelvic development. Ambulatory children with EOS undergoing index distraction-based treatment with distal fixation below T11 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with distal fixation to the pelvis were identified and compared to children with Spine-based fixation at T12-L5. Radiographic measurements were performed for coronal and sagittal alignment in addition to pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) and compared at initial presentation, first erect radiograph, and at 2years following instrumentation. 33 ambulatory children were identified with a minimum of 2-year follow-up (25 female, average 6.59 ± 2.6years), with 33% (N = 11) instrumented to the pelvis (54.4% female, average 4.42 ± 2.2years, initial Cobb 76.1°). Children in the pelvis cohort were significantly younger at treatment initiation (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in PI at the study time periods, however, there was a significant change in PI between presentation and 2-year follow-up with the pelvic fixation demonstrating a mean 12.3° decrease in PI vs a 3.8° increase in the spine-based cohort (P = 0.027). Distal fixation to the pelvis in ambulatory children with EOS treated with growth-friendly instrumentation was associated with a mean decrease in PI of 12.3° that developed over the 2-year treatment duration. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term implications of these findings on pelvic and spinal development.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have