Effects of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in cardiac rehabilitation.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of performing combined resistance and aerobic training, versus aerobic training alone, in patients with coronary artery disease. Thirty-six patients with coronary artery disease were randomized to either an aerobic-only training group (AE) or a combined aerobic and resistance training group (AE + R). Both groups performed 30 minutes of aerobic exercise 3 days/week for 6 months. In addition, AE + R group performed two sets of resistance exercise on seven different Nautilus machines after completion of aerobic training each day. Twenty patients (AE: n = 10; AE + R: n = 10) completed the training protocol with > 70% attendance. Strength gains for AE + R group were greater than for AE group on six of seven resistance machines (P < 0.05). VO2peak increased after training for both AE and AE + R (P < 0.01) with no difference in improvement between the groups. Resting and submaximal exercise heart rates and rate-pressure product were lower after training in the AE + R group (P < 0.01), but not in the AE group. AE + R increased lean mass in arm, trunk, and total body regions (P < 0.01), while AE increased lean mass in trunk region only (P < 0.01). Percent body fat was reduced for AE + R after training (P < 0.05) with a between group trend toward reduced body fat (P = 0.09). Lean mass gain significantly correlated with strength increase in five of seven resistance exercises for AE + R. Resistance training adds to the effects of aerobic training in cardiac rehabilitation patients by improving muscular strength, increasing lean body mass, and reducing body fat.