Effects of Colchicine on Measures of Lipolysis in Adults With Obesity

Abstract

Background: Obesity-associated inflammation promotes adipose tissue (AT) dysfunction and contributes to the progression of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that colchicine may improve metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes; however, colchicine’s effects on metabolic and inflammatory measures within AT remain unclear. Methods: The aim of this study was to examine if colchicine’s anti-inflammatory effects would improve measures of lipolysis and immune cell populations in subcutaneous AT (SAT). This is a secondary analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study in which 40 nondiabetic adults with obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) were randomized to colchicine 0.6mg or placebo twice daily for 3 months. Blood samples for insulin, glucose, and free fatty acids were collected in the fasted state and during a frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Noninsulin-suppressible (l0), insulin-suppressible (l2), and maximal (l0+l2) lipolysis rates were calculated by minimal model analysis. Body composition was determined by DXA. SAT immune cell populations were characterized by flow cytometry fluorescence-activated single cell sorting of the stromovascular fractions obtained after collagenase digestion of SAT samples obtained using a mini-liposuction technique pre- and post-intervention. Results: Data from 18 subjects in the colchicine group (Mean ± SD: age 48.4 ± 13.5 y; BMI 39.3 ± 6.3 kg/m2; sex: female 72.2%) and 18 subjects in the placebo group (age 44.7 ± 10.2 y; BMI 41.8 ± 8.2 kg/m2; sex: female 77.8%) were available for this study. Colchicine treatment significantly reduced l2 (p = 0.04) and l0+l2 (p = 0.04) versus placebo. These changes were significantly associated with reductions in systemic inflammation, including the changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations, white blood cell count, circulating monocyte and neutrophil populations, and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p’s < 0.015). Colchicine did not significantly alter SAT immune cell population distributions (p’s > 0.05). Conclusions: In adults with obesity and MetS, colchicine may improve insulin action at the level of AT. These improvements were positively associated with the suppression of systemic inflammation. However, no local AT inflammatory cell populations were significantly affected by colchicine use in our study, suggesting that colchicine’s systemic, rather than local, anti-inflammatory effects may be more consequential in ameliorating AT metabolic pathways in MetS. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying colchicine’s effects in AT, as these investigations could potentially shed light on treatments to improve metabolic outcomes in human obesity.