Abstract
Abstract Copper (Cu) wire bonding is now widely accepted as a replacement for gold (Au), however, its use in high reliability applications is limited due to early failures in high temperature and humid conditions. The Au to Cu wire transition is mainly driven by cost savings though there are other advantages to Cu such as better electrical and thermal conductivity, slower intermetallic compound (IMC) formation and reduced wire sweep during transfer molding. Some automotive, industrial and aerospace industries are still reluctant to adopt Cu wire bonded products due to perceived risks of wire and bond pad cracks, the potential for corrosion, and some lack of understanding about its reliability in harsh conditions. A wire bond is considered good if destructive sampling qualification tests and periodic monitors pass for the batch. Tests include wire pull strength, wire bond shear, IMC coverage, and thickness of bond pad aluminum (Al) remaining beneath the bond. Nondestructive inspections also verify acceptable ball diameter and Al “splash”. This paper focuses on the bond shear test and its contribution to Cu ball bond reliability assessment, especially when changing Al bond pad thickness. A new revision of the JEDEC Wire Bond Shear Test Method, JESD22-B116B, has just been released, to include Cu wirebonds for the first time. It helps to clarify shear test failure modes for Cu ball bonds. However, there are still questions to be answered through research and experimentation, especially to learn the extent to which one may predict Cu ball bond reliability based on shear test results. Pad Al thickness is not considered in the current industry standards for shear test. Yet bond pad Al thickness varies widely among semiconductor products. This research is intended to contribute toward improved industry standards. In this study, power and time bonding parameters along with bond pad thickness are studied for bond strength. Several wire bonds are created at different conditions, evaluated by optical microscope and SEM, IMC% coverage and bond shear strength. Similar bonding conditions are repeated for bond pads of 4um, 1um and 0.5um thickness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Additional Conferences (Device Packaging, HiTEC, HiTEN, and CICMT)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.